tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-805419860930974367.post6779174717247269528..comments2021-01-31T21:54:50.220-08:00Comments on Elena Pierazzo's Blog: A conceptual model of Text, Documents and Work - Part 1Elena Pierazzohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05729863417896378833noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-805419860930974367.post-56713787223511926572013-08-07T02:36:47.278-07:002013-08-07T02:36:47.278-07:00Thank you Elena, this looks like it's becoming...Thank you Elena, this looks like it's becoming a very interesting model. Am I reading your post correctly when I say that for you text is a purely cognitive concept, that relies entirely on the reader's interpretation of the document (that carries some kind of interpretable marks on it)? Or is it the (more objectively approachable) written part as well?<br /><br />When I read your new post, I was just in the middle of writing a blog post myself, in reaction to both your previous post and Barbara's comment on it. After reading this, I decided to add another paragraph. I was going to put that post on a new blog I'm building, but it's not finished yet. So I quickly put it here, if you're interested: http://woutdillen.wordpress.com/2013/08/07/on-the-materiality-of-text/Wout Dillenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08345101903435654631noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-805419860930974367.post-25847857441161758472013-08-06T10:07:02.131-07:002013-08-06T10:07:02.131-07:00There was an incongruence on the definition of Tex...There was an incongruence on the definition of Text, which I have now updated by adding a reference to the fact that the definition all apply to written material, as said at the beginning.Elena Pierazzohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05729863417896378833noreply@blogger.com